Honda tried this with their s2000 by making the s2000 cr which came without many of the come luxuries of today! But where honda failed is by charging more for the car....dumb. However the new 5.0 is producing more than before at like 400hp now. I forget what the ss is but if the stang is lighter than the ss it will equal out and should be a good race. I'm not bias on either personally I just would like to see gm get back up and keep this going....well i look at it this way, in a way gm had no choice but to put all the extras on there for" modern luxery"
people where going to ***** if they didnt have heated leather seats and all that bullshit
and people are going to ***** for it being to heavy for all the extra weight all that fancy stuff adds.
what people need to remember is the camaro is a MUSCLE CAR...IMO to save weight the only thing they need thats modern is electirc windows. and if people dont like that then they arnt cut out for a muscle car.
but then again this isnt the 60's or 70's...its all about pure profit now.
I agree on the camaro, they killed the design of it. To me it just looks effin huugggeeee!!! I like the more aggressive front end of the mustang still not to crazy on the rear of it though. Challenger is by far the best retrospec of the classic version!IMO, i dont like the new mustangs, they look like they got stepped on.. and i dont like the rear end of the camaro.. i think they destroyed the appearance of the camaro...bring back the damn classic!.
i agree about the challenger. they shouldnt have made them so effin wide, its like a tank.I agree on the camaro, they killed the design of it. To me it just looks effin huugggeeee!!! I like the more aggressive front end of the mustang still not to crazy on the rear of it though. Challenger is by far the best retrospec of the classic version!
dont get me wrong. i love the 5.0 but they didnt do it justice look wise. i'd take a foxbody 5.0 anyday over one of the new ones..I don't know why you guys are hatin on the mustang, Im so glad they brought back the 5.0 L and if it still has improved fuel economy ill drool, making only 10 less hp than the camaro at 300 or so pounds less is definately an upgrade for for....I like what they are doing as a car company